What Style of Leadership Fosters Initiative and Ingenuity among Subordinates? | Leadership


What Style of Leadership Fosters Initiative and Ingenuity among Subordinates?

No one style of leadership is perfect. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. It is important to know when to use each type of leadership and to be aware of the potential problems that can arise. Leaders who are able to adapt their leadership style to fit the situation are more likely to be successful.

What Style of Leadership Fosters Initiative and Ingenuity among Subordinates?

Leaders come in all shapes and sizes. Some are loud and demanding, while others are more passive and quiet. But what style of leadership is most conducive to fostering creativity and ingenuity among subordinates? In this blog post, we will explore the different styles of leadership and discuss which one is best suited for promoting innovation. Stay tuned

What are the Fundamental 4 Styles of Leadership and their pros and cons?

Leadership is a skill that can be learned and developed. But before we start to talk about the different styles of leadership, let’s firstly define what leadership means:

Leaders are able to influence people in various ways by providing guidance, inspiration, and motivation in order to achieve goals. There are different approaches within the field of leadership research. What Style of Leadership Fosters Initiative and Ingenuity among Subordinates?

This article will focus on the four fundamental styles of leadership based on transformational leadership theory

  • Laissez faire,
  • Directive,
  • Supportive
  • Participative.

Laissez-Faire leadership is a hands-off approach in which leaders don’t provide any guidance and allow subordinates to perform tasks on their own.

Directive leadership is an authoritarian approach in which leaders tend to be very controlling and aim for immediate compliance from their subordinates.

In supportive leadership, the leader aims to improve satisfaction by acting as a coach or a mentor who provides support and encouragement to employees.

Participative leadership is based on the idea that supervisors should involve their employees in the decision-making process (Bass, 1985).

Laissez Faire Leadership (Hands Off)

Laissez-Faire leadership involves close to no supervision of subordinates – instead, it encourages independence.

The Laissez fairer leader trusts his/her subordinates with individual responsibility allowing them freedom of action without much intervention or guidance. Some leaders prefer to delegate responsibility and allow subordinates to work without being supervised – however, too much delegation may lead to a lack of vision and direction.

For instance, the Laissez fairer leader leaves it up to employees whether they want to come in early or leave late because he/she believes that people will do their best if they feel independent.

Another example would be the Laissez faire leader who delegates an employee with writing a document but doesn’t provide any feedback on how the document should look like except for saying “I trust you can figure out what needs to be done”.

This approach is useful when working with highly skilled individuals who understand their jobs and can be trusted to complete tasks with minimal guidance. T

The main advantage of the Laissez Faire leadership style is that it allows employees a sense of freedom and independence, leading to high motivation levels as people feel that their efforts are being recognized.

Furthermore, this approach can improve communication and problem-solving abilities as subordinates are allowed to come up with their own solutions.

Disadvantages of Laissez-Faire Leadership

The disadvantages of this leadership style include a lack of control and direction from the leader, which could lead to subordinates not completing tasks or making poor decisions. Additionally, if subordinates do not have the skills required to complete a task, they may struggle without any support from the leader.

Laissez-Faire leadership also requires trust in order for it to be successful – if the leader does not trust his/her subordinates, this leadership style will be ineffective.

Directive Leadership (Authoritarian)

In directive leadership, the leader is in charge and provides close supervision to ensure that tasks are completed according to plan.

The directive leader is very controlling and aims for immediate compliance from their subordinates.

This type of leadership often uses rewards and punishments as a way to motivate employees – for example, the directive leader might give a bonus to an employee who completes a task quickly or issue a warning to an employee who arrives late.

Directive leadership can be useful when there is a need for quick action as it allows leaders to make decisions without consulting with others.

Advantages Direct Leadership

The main advantage of using directive leadership is that it allows for high task performance as the leader provides clear direction in terms of what needs to be done. Directive leadership is also very useful when leaders need to make quick decisions, such as dealing with an emergency situation.

The disadvantage of Direct Leadership

However, this leadership style can be viewed negatively as subordinates may feel like they have no say and lack motivation if they do not agree with the leader’s decision-making process.

Supportive Leadership (Coaching)

In supportive leadership, the supervisor acts more like a coach or mentor who provides support and encouragement towards employees. The supportive leader shows concern for the well-being of his/her followers through actions such as listening carefully to their ideas or providing feedback that is both positive and constructive.

Advantages of Supportive Leadership

The advantages of using a supportive leadership style are that it can improve employee satisfaction and motivation as subordinates feel appreciated by the leader. Additionally, this leadership style can help to develop the skills of followers as they are given the opportunity to participate in decision-making processes.

Dis – Advantages of Supportive Leadership

The main disadvantage of using a supportive leadership approach is that it may take longer for tasks to be completed as leaders spend more time providing support than giving orders.

Pacesetting Leadership (Expert)

In pacesetting leadership, the leader sets high standards for employees and expects them to meet or exceed these expectations. The pacesetter often works alongside employees to ensure that they understand what is expected of them.

This type of leadership is often seen as demanding and can be stressful for employees as they are constantly under pressure to meet the high expectations of their leader.

Advantage of using Pacesetting Leadership

The advantage of using pacesetting leadership is that it leads to high levels of productivity as employees are motivated to achieve the goals set by their leader. Additionally, this type of leadership can improve employee morale as subordinates feel that they are working towards a common goal.

Dis – Advantage of using Pacesetting Leadership

The main disadvantage of using pacesetting leadership is that it can lead to burnout among employees if the standards set by the leader are too unrealistic or challenging.

Adaptive Leadership (Transactional)

In adaptive leadership, the leader changes his/her style depending on the situation – he/she might use an autocratic approach when dealing with a problem that requires quick action, or they could adopt a more democratic style if there is time to consult others before making decisions.

The adaptive leader aims to adapt his/her leadership style so that it suits the needs of employees –

for example, he may offer support and encouragement if subordinates seem demotivated and need reassurance, or give clear instructions if there is an urgent task that needs completing quickly.

Advantages of Using Adaptive Leadership

The advantages of using adaptive leadership are that it allows leaders to respond appropriately in different situations depending on what their followers need from them at any given moment.

What are the Three Styles of Leadership?

The authoritarian leadership style – The authoritarian leadership style is one in which the leader makes all the decisions and gives orders to their subordinates. This type of leader tends to be very demanding and expects their employees to follow their instructions without question.

The democratic leadership style – The democratic leadership style is one in which the leader solicits input from their subordinates before making decisions. This type of leader typically values employee input and believes that it leads to better outcomes.

The Laissez-faire leadership style – The laissez-faire leadership style is one in which the leader allows their subordinates to make most of the decisions. This type of leader typically trusts their employees and believes that they are capable of making good decisions on their own.

In the Bible what are examples of these three styles of Leadership?

  • The Autocratic leadership style – Pharaoh of Egypt
  • The Democratic leadership style – Moses
  • The Laissez-faire leadership style – King Solomon
  • Pharaoh was an autocratic leader. He made all the decisions and gave orders to his people.
  • Moses was a democratic leader. He consulted with the Israelites before making any decisions.
  • King Solomon was a Laissez faire leader. He let his people make their own decisions, but he did step in when necessary.

Which type of leadership is best? That depends on the situation.

Autocratic leadership can be good when there is a need for quick action or when there is danger present.

Democratic leadership can be good when consensus is needed or when more input is required.

Laissez-faire leadership can be good when the group is capable of making good decisions on their own.

No one style of leadership is perfect. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. It is important to know when to use each type of leadership and to be aware of the potential problems that can arise. Leaders who are able to adapt their leadership style to fit the situation are more likely to be successful.

What Styles of Leadership are needed in Churches?

In the Bible, there are many examples of three styles of leadership. These styles in their positive forms can be used by any person. In this article, we will look at some examples of these leaders, and I hope that you can see which type they are an example of.

The first style of leadership is authoritarian leadership. This type of leader makes decisions quickly and expects everyone to follow them.

They are often very decisive and have a clear vision for their organization or church. An example of this type of leadership can be seen in the book of Joshua when he was leading the Israelites into battle. He made quick decisions and expected his people to obey him without question.

The second style of leadership is laissez-faire leadership. This type of leader allows their people to make most of the decisions. They believe that if they trust their people enough, they will make good decisions.

An example of this type can be seen in the book Esther when she was chosen as queen by her husband. She trusted her people to make the right decisions, and it lead to a good outcome for them.

The third style of leadership is democratic leadership. This type of leader wants their people to be involved in every decision that they make. They believe that everyone should have input into what happens within their organization or church so it will run smoothly and effectively at all times.

An example of this type can be seen when Peter was chosen as one of twelve apostles by Jesus Christ himself in Matthew 16:18-19 “And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock, I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.” He wanted his disciples (followers) to have input into what happened within the church, and it helped to make the church stronger.

Final Thoughts – What Style of Leadership Fosters Initiative and Ingenuity among Subordinates?

Each of these three styles of leadership has its own strengths and weaknesses. It is important for churches to have a leader who can use all three of these styles depending on what situation they are in.

For example, if there is a decision that needs to be made quickly an authoritarian leader would be good in that situation.

If there is a time when the church needs to show mercy then a laissez-faire leader would be better suited.

And if the church wants to come up with new ideas then they would need a democratic leader who will involve everyone in the process.

Greg Gaines

Father / Grandfather / Minister / Missionary / Deacon / Elder / Author

Recent Posts